- #Iridient developer fujifilm presets pro#
- #Iridient developer fujifilm presets iso#
- #Iridient developer fujifilm presets series#
Some lossless compressed RAF files from early X-H2S firmware sporadically contain an invalid RAW metadata field that would would cause these files to fail to load.
Fixed a problem that caused Develop and Batch develop to fail when adjusting HDR/Dodge/Color Burn/Highlight/Shadow and White Balance at the same time for Apple ProRAW. 3.7.1 - J(Maintenance Release) Bug Fix: Fixed an issue with errors on loading of some RAF images from the Fujifilm X-H2S.Adjusted brightness when opening DNG format RAWs taken with the Pentax K-3 Mark III.Support added for RAW images from the Fujifilm X-H2.
#Iridient developer fujifilm presets pro#
3.8 Octo(Major Release) New Features: Support added for RAW and ProRAW images from the Apple iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Plus, iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max.
#Iridient developer fujifilm presets iso#
by Dynamic Default were not changed for each ISO sensitivity when RAWs shot with the Canon EOS R3 were opened. Iridient Developer 3.8 has been released with Fujifilm X-H2 support this is a major update, and you can download a copy here. Fixed a problem that the initial values of Sharpening, Noise reduction, etc.Fixed a problem that could cause the white balance color temperature may not be reproduced properly when opening a RAW shot with the white balance set to "Daylight" on the Canon EOS R5.I find the C1 user interface obtuse, and I achieve better results using X-Transformer plug-in via LR. Completely unimpressed, given the hype I've read on several Fuji-dedicated sites. Quote from: Rand47 on May 28, 2018, 01:52:41 pm I've done exactly this. Fuji isn't just about sensor size, quality of glass, etc., there's a lot more going on and available in the Fuji ecosphere than is immediately apparent, and to my way of thinking, Fuji does a really poor job in explaining / marketing this aspect of their system. This is one of the reasons I'm not tempted to move to the Sony "silver-bullet da jour" craze. But it works and is VERY powerful in terms of results. In fact, now Fuji has this program that allows you to process your RAFs via your computer, using the camera's processing.
#Iridient developer fujifilm presets series#
Made me grumpy, actually, since I have this monster computer on my desk that "has to be better" than whatever processing power the little camera has internally. Improved support for Fujifilm X series camera white balance presets (daylight, cloudy, shade, tungsten, fluorescent) directly from RAF image metadata. I could not get better high ISO noise handling in my RAF files than Fuji did with its jpegs processed in-camera. there's an obvious answer there, sir! :-) And you might find this video interesting: One of the discoveries I made early on was that no matter what technique, or plug-in, or whatever I used. I can often zero that slider out completely, or start there and only add very small increments to eliminate any color noise.Īs to the OP's original question.
One significant sharpness robber in LR default is the color noise default. Radius is image frequency dependent, as always. Typically lots of masking, high detail amounts, and "easy as you go" on amount are in order. Sharpening of RAF is "it's own thing" and there is lots of useful information around on useful approaches.
As long as one knows to disable any LR detail panel defaults via preset on ingestion, the last remaining sub-optimal LR conversion attributes are eliminated. Adobe have been slowly (as in glacially) improving RAF conversion for the last couple of years (and my guess is will be paying even more attention as Fuji market-share grows). The truth is, there is no magic bullet for RAF files. Completely unimpressed, given the hype I've read on several Fuji-dedicated sites. Fujifilm X-T1, Zeiss Touit 2.8/50M, RAW / Iridient Developer & Aperture Fuji X Secrets workshops Read the X-Pert Corner blog.
0 kommentar(er)
